Not all Douglas firs are good at dealing with climate change. Graduation project is awarded thesis prize.
Sauren did his research in Drenthe. In the woods near Schoonoord there is an experimental plot consisting of Douglas firs planted in 1971, from various states along the west coast of America. Sauren studied firs from 18 different places of origin. He measured their growth and looked for relationships with the weather and the climate. According to Sauren, the Douglas firs generally behave the same here as in North America. 'The trees from the north grow fastest. Those from the southern and central areas grow a bit less quickly but are better able to cope with drought.' The latter effect is clear from how the trees responded to the extremely dry summer of 2003. 'The trees that grow fastest are hit harder and take longer to recover.'
That gives a couple of clear winners according to Sauren's scale: Douglas firs from Shelton (Washington) and Vernonia (Oregon). But he says that does not mean we should now replace all our Douglas firs immediately. 'The droughts forecast for the Netherlands are not so bad that the firs would not be able to survive. But it may be different in other parts of Europe. Also, you don't know what the forestry managers want: high levels of timber production, or woods that can cope with climate change.' Sauren's study won the Toekomstboom 2012 thesis prize, awarded by the Toekomstboom foundation and the Dutch and Flemish forestry associations KNBV and BOS+. He received 750 euros and a trophy.