Science - October 3, 2019

How can we halve nitrogen emissions in the livestock sector? - 'Concentrate on the cowsheds'

Albert Sikkema

The Netherlands must drastically cut its nitrogen emissions from livestock farming, industry and traffic so as to protect nature, says the Remkes commission. Exactly how this should be done, the commission doesn’t say. Wageningen researchers offer four options for the livestock sector. With the inevitable ifs and buts.

Text Albert Sikkema Illustration Geert-Jan Bruins

The Remkes Commission, formed to advise the cabinet on short-term solutions to the nitrogen problem (see pp 14-15), published its first report last week. One of its recommendations is that the government should buy up and clean up polluting livestock farms located close to nature areas in the short term. Other farms should install extra emissions-cutting measures. The commission does not suggest by what percentage nitrogen emissions must go down, nor which easures farmers should take to restore nature. Wim de Vries, personal professor in the Environmental Systems Analysis chair group and a nitrogen specialist, does give a percentage. He thinks nitrogen emissions in all sectors, including livestock, have got to be halved. How could the livestock sector manage that?

Halving livestock numbers

Many politicians and campaigners think halving livestock numbers is the solution. In principle, they are right, says De Vries: halving the number of cows, pigs and chickens would lead to a halving of the emissions from harmful nitrogen compounds such as ammonia (see pp 14-15). But the professor sees other options too. Dairy farmers could aim at reducing ammonia emissions from manure in the cowshed, for instance.

Within agriculture, dairy farming is the biggest nitrogen producer. The sector is responsible for about 60 per cent of the nitrogen problem, pig farming for 20 per cent and chicken farming for 10 per cent. That is remarkable in itself. Because why do 3.9 million cows produce much more nitrogen than 12 million pigs and 100 million chickens put together? Because the pigs and chickens live in closed sheds fitted with air filters and designed to reduce ammonia formation. As a result, ammonia emissions in pig and chicken farming have gone down a lot in the past 30 years.

Closed cowsheds

In the dairy sector, the cows are often kept in open sheds with few emissions-restricting measures in place. Emissions have gone down in this sector too, but that was mainly through injecting manure into the land and reducing the number of cows. So researcher Roland Melse of Wageningen Livestock Research suggests a solution to the nitrogen problem in the dairy sector that is as simple as it is controversial: put the dairy cows in closed sheds with air filters. Chemical air filters capture 85 per cent of the ammonia, on average. Melse describes his proposal as ‘swearing in church’ because nowadays what we want is open stalls and cows grazing in the fields. But that is precisely the way to end up with a lot of ammonia from cows in the environment.

Ammonia formation

A colleague of Melse’s at Wageningen Livestock Research, Karin Groenestein, has come up with a different solution. She wants to tackle the ammonia problem at the source, namely the moment the substance is formed. That happens when the cow’s urine and poo get mixed. You can prevent this by quickly separating and removing the manure. Thinning manure with water, acidifying or cooling manure and reducing the surface it covers also help reduce ammonia formation. With a combination of these measures, dairy farmers can reduce ammonia emissions from cowsheds by over 80 per cent, Groenestein’s colleague Andre Aarnink calculated last year. So this kind of ‘tackling at the source’ can compete with the air filter.

Although it is important to do something about the cowsheds, that won’t be enough to halve nitrogen emissions, says Wim de Vries. Emissions from the sheds only account for 30 per cent of the ammonia emissions from dairy farming. Nitrogen also gets into the environment through the storage of manure and its application on the land, and most of the emissions-cutting measures in this regard have already been put in place. Besides, investing in low-nitrogen sheds costs the farmers money.

Less nitrogen input

Wageningen alumnus Frank Verhoeven, one of minister of Agriculture Carola Schouten’s advisors on circular agriculture, suggested another way of solving the nitrogen problem in the sector magazine Boerderij: halve the inputs of nitrogen in agriculture in the form of artificial fertilizer and concentrated feeds. By purchasing less nitrogen, he foresees that livestock farmers can close the nitrogen cycle. Good idea, responds Wim de Vries. ‘That is called the “feedprint”. With less nitrogen in the livestock feed, you reduce the amount of nitrogen in the manure and therefore the emissions of ammonia too. But importing less livestock feed does mean you can keep less livestock in the Netherlands, unless you can keep up the milk production with less nitrogen in the feed. Also, this doesn’t produce nearly enough of a nitrogen reduction to meet the targets.’

Four ways of cutting nitrogen emissions in livestock farming:

1. Less livestock
2. Air filters in dairy farming
3. Better manure management in dairy farming to reduce ammonia formation
4. Livestock feed that contains less nitrogen

Also read:

resource_wageningenur_nl_forum_reactions_wrapper for object 43 of type wm_language nl_gx_webmanager_cms_core_implementation_languageimpl 5

  • Kees van Lambalgen

    De grote hoeveelheid stikstof, voor mais en Engels raaigras geen probleem, hoge opbrengsten en weelderige groei

    Maar onze eigen inheemse flora kan daar dus zeker niet tegen en leggen het loodje.

    in heel veel bossen zie je de gevolgen. Vooral brandnetels en bramen en vlier
    Deze massale groei gaat dus ten koste van kwetsbare inheemse flora
    Dus steeds meer POEPPLANTEN en steeds minder variatie (biodiversiteit)
    Dit heeft vanzelf ook zijn weerslag voor fauna dus ook vlinders insecten enz enz

  • Piet Hein Geurink

    Het is een bijdrage aan het halen van de doelstelling. De voerverbouwer kan ook de dierhouder zijn die zijn gras- en hooi productie opvoert met xtra stikstof. Import zal ik kijken, maar bij koeien is het vooral ruwvoer. Varkens krachtvoer.

  • Piet Hein Geurink

    Niet minder veevoer, maar stikstofarm veevoer. De voerverbouwer vergroot zijn gewasopbrengst met N, waar boerderijdieren verder niks aan hebben.

  • Piet Hein Geurink

    N wordt te weelderig gebruikt, ook in de landbouw. Krijg je snelle groeiers als lupinen, brandnetels, klimops, grassen.

  • Piet Hein Geurink

    Geheel niet mee eens. Het CBS geeft aan dat bijv. koeien 70% van de opgegeten N weer uitpoepen en -piesen. Dat is stikstofrijk gras en hooi. Die kan best door snijmaïs vervangen worden. Overbodig opgegeten.
    Ureum en urease kunnen gescheiden opgevangen en uitgereden worden. Koeien in de wei poepen en piesen niet op dezelfde plek. Misschien vinden ze het stinken.
    Boeren kunnen best minder stikstof op het weidegras deponeren. Over een paar jaar staat er dan stikstofarm gras, hoeven ze geen snijmaïs meer te kopen.
    Chemische luchtwassers zijn ook erg duur, begrijp ik. Die hoeft niet in de stal. Een filter op de mestput kan ook.